COLLECTIVE ACTION AND EMPOWERMENT: EVALUATING FARMER PRODUCER ORGANISATIONS IN THE RICE BOWL OF CENTRAL INDIA

Authors

  • Dr. Dipti Baghel Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce, Dr. K.C. Baghel Government P.G College, Bhilai-3, Chhattisgarh, India Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1512-7288
  • Dr. Archi Dubey Assistant Professor and Head, Faculty of Management Studies, The ICFAI University, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29121/ShodhPrabandhan.v3.i2.2026.96

Keywords:

Farmer Producer Organisations, Chhattisgarh, Agricultural Empowerment, Smallholder Farmers, Exploratory Factor Analysis, Market Linkage, Spss, Rural Development

Abstract

Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs) have emerged as a pivotal institutional mechanism for agrarian transformation in India, enabling smallholder farmers to collectively access markets, credit, technology, and value-chain integration. Despite significant policy emphasis at the national level, empirical evidence on the functional status, perceived benefits, and structural challenges of FPOs in the tribal-agrarian landscape of Chhattisgarh remains sparse. This study investigates the status of FPOs in Chhattisgarh, identifies the opportunities available for member farmers, and delineates strategic interventions necessary for their empowerment. A multi-stage random sampling procedure was employed to survey 385 farmer-members across five purposively selected districts — Raipur, Durg, Rajnandgaon, Bastar, and Surguja. Structured questionnaires incorporating five-point Likert-scale items were administered, and data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics v.26. Statistical tools included descriptive analysis, reliability testing (Cronbach's alpha), exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with principal component extraction, independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD post-hoc comparison, and multiple linear regression. Cronbach's alpha for composite scales ranged from 0.791 to 0.863, confirming adequate internal consistency. EFA yielded four latent constructs — Institutional Support, Market Linkage, Financial Inclusion, and Capacity Building — explaining 62.34% of cumulative variance. Regression analysis revealed that market linkage (β = 0.387, p < .001) and institutional support (β = 0.312, p < .001) were the strongest predictors of farmer empowerment. ANOVA indicated statistically significant income differentials across FPO membership tenure groups (F(3, 381) = 14.72, p < .001, η² = 0.104). Findings underscore systemic deficits in governance transparency, professional management, and last-mile digital infrastructure as barriers to optimal FPO performance. The study recommends a Chhattisgarh-specific FPO Acceleration Framework comprising cluster-based business planning, gender-inclusive governance mandates, digital market platform integration, and dedicated concessional financing windows.

References

ASER Centre. (2022). Annual Status of Education Report (Rural) 2022. Pratham Education Foundation.

Agricultural Census Division. (2019). Agriculture Census 2015–16: All India Report on Number and Area of Operational Holdings. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India.

Birthal, P. S., Joshi, P. K., Roy, D., and Thorat, A. (2015). Diversification in Indian Agriculture Toward High-Value Crops: The Role of smallholders. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12054

Census of India. (2011). Primary Census Abstracts: Scheduled Tribes. Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, Government of India.

Chirwa, E., Dorward, A., Kachule, R., Kumwenda, I., Kydd, J., Poole, N., Poulton, C., and Stockbridge, M. (2005). Walking Tightropes: Supporting Farmer Organisations for Market Access (Natural Resource Perspectives No. 99). Overseas Development Institute.

Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). John Wiley and Sons.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Creswell, J. W., and Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale Development: Theory and Applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Chhattisgarh. (2022). Statistical Digest of Chhattisgarh 2021–22. Government of Chhattisgarh.

Fischer, E., and Qaim, M. (2012). Linking Smallholders to Markets: Determinants and Impacts of Farmer Collective Action in Kenya. World Development, 40(6), 1255–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.018

Government of India. (2020). Central Sector Scheme on Formation and Promotion of 10,000 Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs). Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575

Markelova, H., Meinzen-Dick, R., Hellin, J., and Dohrn, S. (2009). Collective Action for Smallholder Market access. Food Policy, 34(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.10.001

Meinzen-Dick, R., Quisumbing, A., Doss, C., and Theis, S. (2019). Women's Land Rights as a Pathway to Poverty Reduction: Framework and Review of Available Evidence. Agricultural Systems, 172, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.01.014

Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare. (2020). Scheme for Formation and Promotion of Farmer Producer Organisations (FPOs): Operational guidelines. Government of India.

Mishra, S., and Tripathy, S. (2021). Farmer Producer Companies in Chhattisgarh: A Study of Paddy-Based FPOs in Raipur Division. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(3), 412–428.

Mojo, D., Fischer, C., and Degefa, T. (2017). The Determinants and Economic Impacts of Membership in Coffee Farmer Cooperatives: Recent Evidence from Rural Ethiopia. Journal of Rural Studies, 50, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.12.010

NITI Aayog. (2022). Aspirational Districts Programme: Progress and Learnings. Government of India.

Nair, G. K. (2011). Producer Organisations in India: An Overview of Policies and Programmes. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development. (2021). NABARD annual report 2020–21. NABARD.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674041660

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763

Parihar, S., and Tiwari, R. (2019). Functional Performance of Farmer Producer Companies in Madhya Pradesh. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 32(2), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2019.00024.5

Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper and Row.

Rangarajan, C., and Krishnamurthy, S. (2020). Agricultural Cooperatives in Transition: Evidence from Maharashtra. Economic and Political Weekly, 55(14), 48–57.

Rao, N., and Suri, K. C. (2022). Digital Divide in Central Indian Agriculture: Infrastructure, Adoption and Policy Implications. Journal of Development Studies, 58(7), 1341–1359. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2022.2044583

Reardon, T., Echeverria, R., Berdegué, J., Minten, B., Liverpool-Tasie, S., Tschirley, D., and Zilberman, D. (2021). Ag, Food, and Rural Transformation in LMICs: A mini-review of evidence. Global Food Security, 29, Article 100506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100506

Shinoj, P., Tharian, G. K., and Kumar, V. (2017). Performance of Farmer Producer Companies in India: An Assessment. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(1), 129–144.

Small Farmers' Agribusiness Consortium. (2023). Status of FPO Registration and Operations: Annual Report 2022–23. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India.

Sontakki, B. S., Bheemaiah, J., Latha, L., and Jain, R. (2020). Determinants of Performance of Farmer Producer Companies: Evidence from SFAC-Promoted FPOs. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 33(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2020.00018.1

Trebbin, A. (2014). Linking Small Farmers to Modern Retail Through Producer Organisations: Experiences with Producer Companies in India. Food Policy, 45, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.12.007

Trebbin, A., and Hassler, M. (2012). Farmers' Producer Companies in India: A New Concept for Collective Action? Environment and Planning A, 44(2), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44143

Verhofstadt, E., and Maertens, M. (2014). Smallholder Cooperatives and Agricultural Performance in Rwanda: Do Organisational Differences Matter? Agricultural Economics, 45(Suppl. S1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12128

Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. Free Press.

Wollni, M., and Zeller, M. (2007). Do Farmers Benefit from Participating in Specialty Markets and Cooperatives? The Case of Coffee Marketing in Costa Rica. Agricultural Economics, 37(2–3), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2007.00270.x

Downloads

Published

2026-07-07