EFFICIENCY DYNAMICS OF MICROFINANCE INSTITUTIONS: A DATA ENVELOPMENT APPROACH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/ShodhPrabandhan.v3.i2.2026.143Keywords:
Pure Technical Efficiency, Technical Efficiency, Scale Efficiency, Data Envelopment AnalysisAbstract
The efforts have been in the study to assess the effectiveness of 30 Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) in four areas using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) through returns to scale (RTS), scale efficiency (SE), pure technical efficiency (PTE) and overall technical efficiency (OTE).
The findings describe that majority of MFIs experience varied degrees of inefficiency, while only one-third run at maximum efficiency. Several MFIs in the inefficient group exhibit great management skills, however they also have scale inefficiencies, which suggests that production efficiency has decreased as a result of expansion beyond ideal size. More than half of the DMUs have dual inefficiencies, which are connected to both technology and scale. This suggests that operational design, governance and resource allocation are structurally flawed. The prevalence of diminishing returns to scale (DRS) highlights the structural concerns of uneven growth tactics. The policy implications include comparing successful MFIs to best-practice models, encouraging strategic restructuring to align operations with productive scales and supporting capacity-building programs. Regulators are advised to develop frameworks that promote sustainable growth while maintaining efficacy. The findings demonstrate the importance of sector-wide learning, efficiency tracking and balanced growth in enhancing MFIs' long-term sustainability and impact.
References
Armendáriz, B., and Morduch, J. (2010). The Economics of Microfinance. MIT Press.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W. W. (1984). Models for the Estimation of Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
Bassem, B. S. (2008). Governance and Performance of Microfinance Institutions in Mediterranean Countries. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 9(4), 501–510. https://doi.org/10.3846/1611-1699.2008.9.501-510
Bassem, B. S. (2014). Total Factor Productivity Change of MENA Microfinance Institutions: A Malmquist Productivity Index Approach. Economic Modelling, 39, 182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.02.035
Bhanot, D., and Bapat, V. (2015). Sustainability Index of Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) and Contributory Factors. International Journal of Social Economics, 42(4), 387–403.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., and Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
Coelli, T. J., Prasada Rao, D. S., O'Donnell, C. J., and Battese, G. E. (2005). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Springer.
Cull, R., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., and Morduch, J. (2007). Financial Performance and Outreach: A Global Analysis of Leading Microbanks. The Economic Journal, 117(517), F107–F133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02017.x
Cull, R., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., and Morduch, J. (2009). Microfinance Meets the Market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.23.1.167
Ferrier, G. D., and Lovell, C. K. (1990). Measuring Cost Efficiency in Banking: Econometric and Linear Programming Evidence. Journal of Econometrics, 46(1–2), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90057-Z
Gutiérrez-Nieto, B., and Serrano-Cinca, C. (2019). 20 Years of Research in Microfinance: An Information Management Approach. International Journal of Information Management, 47, 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.001
Gutiérrez-Nieto, B., Serrano-Cinca, C., and Molinero, C. M. (2007). Microfinance Institutions and Efficiency. Omega, 35(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.04.001
Haq, M., Skully, M., and Pathan, S. (2010). Efficiency of Microfinance Institutions: A Data Envelopment Analysis. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 17(1), 63–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-009-9103-7
Hermes, N., and Hudon, M. (2019). Determinants of the Performance of Microfinance Institutions: A Systematic Review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(5), 1483–1513. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12290
Hermes, N., Lensink, R., and Meesters, A. (2011). Outreach and Efficiency of Microfinance Institutions. World Development, 39(6), 938–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.018
Hudon, M., and Traca, D. (2011). On the Efficiency Effects of Subsidies in Microfinance: An Empirical Inquiry. World Development, 39(6), 966–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.017
Kar, A. K. (2012). Does Capital and Financing Structure Have Any Relevance to the Performance of Microfinance Institutions? International Review of Applied Economics, 26(3), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2011.580267
Ledgerwood, J. (1999). Microfinance Handbook: An Institutional and Financial Perspective. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-4306-7
Ledgerwood, J., Earne, J., and Nelson, C. (Eds.). (2013). The New Microfinance Handbook: A Financial Market System Perspective. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8927-0
Lensink, R. (2011). Recent Developments in Microfinance and the Impact of the Financial Crisis. Ethical Perspectives, 18(4), 569–590.
Louis, P., Seret, A., and Baesens, B. (2013). Financial Efficiency and Social Impact of Microfinance Institutions Using Self-Organizing Maps. World Development, 46, 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.02.006
Mersland, R. (2009). The Cost of Ownership in Microfinance Organizations. World Development, 37(2), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.03.006
Mersland, R., and Strøm, R. Ø. (2009). Performance and Governance in Microfinance Institutions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(4), 662–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.11.009
Mersland, R., and Strøm, R. Ø. (2010). Microfinance Mission Drift? World Development, 38, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.05.006
Quayes, S. (2012). Depth of Outreach and Financial Sustainability of Microfinance Institutions. Applied Economics, 44(26), 3421–3433. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.577016
Rhyne, E. (2001). Mainstreaming Microfinance: How Lending to the Poor Began, Grew and Came of Age in Bolivia. Kumarian Press.
Schreiner, M. (2002). Aspects of Outreach: A Framework for Discussion of the Social Benefits of Microfinance. Journal of International Development, 14(5), 591–603. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.908
Sealey, C. W., Jr., and Lindley, J. T. (1977). Inputs, Outputs and a Theory of Production and Cost at Depository Financial Institutions. The Journal of Finance, 32(4), 1251–1266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03324.x
Shastry, V., and Rai, V. (2025). Beyond the Business Case: Impacts and Resilience Post-Adoption of Decentralized Renewable Energy for Rural Livelihoods. Energy for Sustainable Development, 84, 101600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2024.101600
Singh, K. (2024). Economics and Financial Sustainability in Microfinancing: Do Investment Flows Toward Developing Countries, Rural Areas, Microenterprises and Female Borrowers Foster Institutionalization? Studies in Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-08-2024-0474
Sinha, A., Ahmed, N., Ahmed, S., Abeer, I. A., Rony, R. J., Saha, A., and Khan, S. (2024). Roles of Technology for Risk Communication and Community Engagement in Bangladesh During Covid-19 Pandemic. ACM Journal on Computing and Sustainable Societies, 2(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3648433
Yunus, M. (2003). Banker to the Poor: Microlending and the Battle Against World Poverty.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Bhawna, Suresh Kumar Mital (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



















